The Luton Aquatic Centre is contractually constrained to cost no more than £26 million (already making it no more expensive than the most recent estimate for our as yet un-contracted St Albans new build). Among other things the people of Luton are going to get the following for their £26 million:
The new centre here in St. Albans does however give us a better 'leisure offer' in at least the following respects- Luton aren't getting:
We note with interest that the 25m pool in the current plan for St. Albans is often described by its promoters as competition standard and that the 50m pool in Luton is also described as "A competition standard 50m, eight lane pool". We can also find no evidence of anyone from Luton or its swimming clubs complaining about the imposition of an impractical, overly long and overly expensive 50m pool and demanding a 25m pool instead, though, sadly, it seems some club swimmers in St. Albans are rather less ambitious (see recent correspondence in the Herts Advertiser: Pool Protest Row Continued). We also note with interest that S&P are also the architects of the Luton Aquatic Centre. When the people of Luton were consulted about their new centre (you can see the results of the Luton consultation here) this is what happened:
It is interesting to compare and contrast this consultation with our experience in St. Albans which apparently resulted in us giving our approval for a 25m pool. We would like to offer our special thanks to Councillor Robert Donald for drawing our attention to the relevance of the Luton development. During a speech at the recent planning meeting (we think he was trying to rubbish us) he made the rather confusing point that there was no possible justification for a 50m pool in Hertfordshire at all because the Luton 50m pool project was going to go ahead, and that we should also not build a 50m pool here and now in St. Albans because it would be fantastically more expensive and... besides... a new 50m pool was probably going to be built at some unspecified point in the future in Hatfield- maybe- although he did also helpfully point out earlier that Hatfield already has excellent and extensive swimming facilities (also, l have just checked, and Hatfield is still in Hertfordshire, and Luton is still not in Hertfordshire). As well as being a bit confusing, and, from the above, seemingly misleading on the cost issue, Mr Donald (or those who briefed him) may also be interested to learn the following:
[I offer my profound apologies to Sandy Walkington, for whom I mistook Concillor Donald in an earlier version of this post!] |
Announcements: >